San Marcos |
Code of Ordinances |
SubPart A. GENERAL ORDINANCES |
Chapter 54. MISCELLANEOUS OFFENSES |
Article 3. CURFEW |
Division 2. MINORS |
§ 54.079. Defenses.
(a)
It is a defense to prosecution under section 54.078 that the minor was:
(1)
Accompanied by the minor's parent;
(2)
On an errand that was reasonably necessary, in that an adult was unable or unavailable to perform the errand; the errand could not be postponed until after curfew hours; the errand was at the direction of the minor's parent; and the minor was using a direct route;
(3)
In a motor vehicle involved in interstate travel;
(4)
Engaged in an employment activity, including but not limited to newspaper delivery, and was using a direct route;
(5)
Involved in an emergency;
(6)
On the sidewalk abutting the minor's residence or abutting the residence of a next-door neighbor if the neighbor did not complain to a peace officer about the minor's presence;
(7)
Attending an official school or religious activity or returning home by a direct route from an official school or religious activity;
(8)
Exercising First Amendment rights protected by the United States Constitution, the free exercise of religion, freedom of speech and the right of assembly;
(9)
Married or had been married or had disabilities of minority removed in accordance with V.T.C.A., Family Code ch. 31; or
(10)
Carrying a valid college identification card identifying the minor as a college student.
(b)
It is a defense to prosecution under section 54.078 with respect to the curfew hours described in subsection (3) of the definition of curfew hours in section 54.076 that:
(1)
The minor was a high school graduate or has equivalent certification;
(2)
The minor was on an excused absence from his place of schooling; or
(3)
The minor's school was not in session.
(Ord. No. 1994-68, § 1 (16-82), 8-22-94; Ord. No. 2001-38, § 1, 5-21-01; Ord. No. 2004-21, 5-10-04; Ord. No. 2009-28, § 1, 6-2-09; Ord. No. 2012-16, § 2, 4-3-12; Ord. No. 2015-13, § 2, 4-21-15 )